Filed: Jul. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6361 ANDRE A. WASHINGTON, a/k/a Andre King Bey, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; PETERSBURG CIRCUIT COURT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00871-REP-RCY) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6361 ANDRE A. WASHINGTON, a/k/a Andre King Bey, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; PETERSBURG CIRCUIT COURT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00871-REP-RCY) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished p..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6361 ANDRE A. WASHINGTON, a/k/a Andre King Bey, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; PETERSBURG CIRCUIT COURT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00871-REP-RCY) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre A. Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Andre A. Washington appeals the district court’s order remanding his criminal cases to the Petersburg Circuit Court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 3:18-cv-00871-REP-RCY (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
