Filed: Jul. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6661 UBALDO ARRIAGA RAMIREZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LARRY RABON, MD (UCAC); STEPHEN HOEY, D.O. (BOP) Contract; CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, Public Health (APRN/FNP-C); MICHAEL BUNNELL, RN Public Health; LAWRENCE CROSS, HSA Public Health, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (0:18-cv-01846-DCC) Submitted: July 1
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6661 UBALDO ARRIAGA RAMIREZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LARRY RABON, MD (UCAC); STEPHEN HOEY, D.O. (BOP) Contract; CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, Public Health (APRN/FNP-C); MICHAEL BUNNELL, RN Public Health; LAWRENCE CROSS, HSA Public Health, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (0:18-cv-01846-DCC) Submitted: July 18..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6661
UBALDO ARRIAGA RAMIREZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LARRY RABON, MD (UCAC); STEPHEN HOEY, D.O. (BOP) Contract;
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, Public Health (APRN/FNP-C); MICHAEL BUNNELL,
RN Public Health; LAWRENCE CROSS, HSA Public Health,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (0:18-cv-01846-DCC)
Submitted: July 18, 2019 Decided: July 23, 2019
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ubaldo Arriaga Ramirez, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ubaldo Arriaga Ramirez appeals the district court’s order adopting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying Ramirez’s motion for the appointment
of counsel, and denying relief on his complaint alleging a Bivens * claim, a Federal Tort
Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012) claim, and a state medical
malpractice claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ramirez v. Rabon,
No. 0:18-cv-01846-DCC (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2019).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S.
388 (1971).
2