Filed: Aug. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6484 GARY WALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. N. STEVENS, Correctional Officer of ROSP; A. VAUGHAN, Correctional Officer of ROSP; LT. C. GILBERT, Charlie Building Supervisor; SGT. J. HALL, Charlie Building Supervisor; L. MCCOWAN, Correctional Officer of ROSP; A. O’QUINN, Defendants – Appellees, and S. SHORTRIDGE, Operations Manager/“Active” PREA Manager of ROSP; BARKSDALE, Warden of ROSP, Defendants. Appeal from the United Stat
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6484 GARY WALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. N. STEVENS, Correctional Officer of ROSP; A. VAUGHAN, Correctional Officer of ROSP; LT. C. GILBERT, Charlie Building Supervisor; SGT. J. HALL, Charlie Building Supervisor; L. MCCOWAN, Correctional Officer of ROSP; A. O’QUINN, Defendants – Appellees, and S. SHORTRIDGE, Operations Manager/“Active” PREA Manager of ROSP; BARKSDALE, Warden of ROSP, Defendants. Appeal from the United State..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6484
GARY WALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
N. STEVENS, Correctional Officer of ROSP; A. VAUGHAN, Correctional Officer
of ROSP; LT. C. GILBERT, Charlie Building Supervisor; SGT. J. HALL, Charlie
Building Supervisor; L. MCCOWAN, Correctional Officer of ROSP; A. O’QUINN,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
S. SHORTRIDGE, Operations Manager/“Active” PREA Manager of ROSP;
BARKSDALE, Warden of ROSP,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:16-cv-00373-JLK-PMS)
Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 23, 2019
Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Wall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary Wall appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wall v. Stevens, No. 7:16-cv-00373-
JLK-PMS (W.D. Va. Mar. 26, 2019 & Apr. 11, 2019). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3