Filed: Aug. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6421 SCOTLAND E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEPHEN MOYER, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services; DAYENA CORCORAN, Commissioner of Correction; FRANK BISHOP, Warden; MAILROOM STAFF, Doe 1-10; MAILROOM SUPERVISOR; M. ROSE; ROBERT KRUISE, JR., Correctional Officer 2; R. HAMMONS, Librarian, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. El
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6421 SCOTLAND E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEPHEN MOYER, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services; DAYENA CORCORAN, Commissioner of Correction; FRANK BISHOP, Warden; MAILROOM STAFF, Doe 1-10; MAILROOM SUPERVISOR; M. ROSE; ROBERT KRUISE, JR., Correctional Officer 2; R. HAMMONS, Librarian, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ell..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6421
SCOTLAND E. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STEPHEN MOYER, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services;
DAYENA CORCORAN, Commissioner of Correction; FRANK BISHOP, Warden;
MAILROOM STAFF, Doe 1-10; MAILROOM SUPERVISOR; M. ROSE;
ROBERT KRUISE, JR., Correctional Officer 2; R. HAMMONS, Librarian,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00363-ELH)
Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 26, 2019
Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scotland E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Scotland E. Williams appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants
summary judgment in Williams’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Williams v. Moyer, No. 1:18-cv-00363-ELH (D. Md. filed Mar. 6, 2019 &
entered Mar. 7, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2