Filed: Aug. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6499 DAVID LEE SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. RICK JACKSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:06-hc-02061-BO) Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 27, 2019 Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Davi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6499 DAVID LEE SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. RICK JACKSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:06-hc-02061-BO) Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 27, 2019 Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6499
DAVID LEE SMITH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
RICK JACKSON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:06-hc-02061-BO)
Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 27, 2019
Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Lee Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for
release pending appeal of the court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions for
reconsideration of the court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Jackson, No. 5:06-hc-02061-BO (E.D.N.C.
Mar. 21, 2019). We deny Smith’s motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2