Filed: Sep. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1509 SHOMARI E. NORMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EVONNE S. HOPKINS, Attorney; JUDGE LORI CHRISTIAN; MARC ANTHONY, Attorney; NC CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-cv-00343-D) Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1509 SHOMARI E. NORMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EVONNE S. HOPKINS, Attorney; JUDGE LORI CHRISTIAN; MARC ANTHONY, Attorney; NC CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-cv-00343-D) Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, a..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1509
SHOMARI E. NORMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EVONNE S. HOPKINS, Attorney; JUDGE LORI CHRISTIAN; MARC
ANTHONY, Attorney; NC CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-cv-00343-D)
Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shomari E. Norman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Shomari E. Norman seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and dismissing Norman’s claim against one of the Defendants,
Lori Christian, as barred by judicial immunity. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Norman seeks to appeal is neither a final order
nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2