Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Heather Hoffman v. Charter Communications, Inc., 19-1460 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 19-1460 Visitors: 34
Filed: Sep. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1460 HEATHER C. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee, and SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT HOLDING COMPANY LLC, f/k/a Time Warner Cable Inc., Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (9:18-cv-01145-RMG-MGB) Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019 Before WYNN and H
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1460 HEATHER C. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee, and SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT HOLDING COMPANY LLC, f/k/a Time Warner Cable Inc., Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (9:18-cv-01145-RMG-MGB) Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Heather C. Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Kendrick Bell, ROBINSON, GRAY, STEPP & LAFFITTE, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Heather C. Hoffman appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint alleging illegal rate increases for cable television and internet service. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoffman v. Charter Commc’ns, Inc., No. 9:18-cv-01145-RMG-MGB (D.S.C. Apr. 2, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer