Filed: Sep. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6622 NATHAN RAILEY, filing as amicus curiae for Whitey Bulger, Petitioner - Appellant, v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv-00199-GMG) Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 27, 2019 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circ
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6622 NATHAN RAILEY, filing as amicus curiae for Whitey Bulger, Petitioner - Appellant, v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv-00199-GMG) Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 27, 2019 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6622
NATHAN RAILEY, filing as amicus curiae for Whitey Bulger,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv-00199-GMG)
Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 27, 2019
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathan Railey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathan Railey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Railey v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 3:18-cv-00199-GMG (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 11,
2019). However, because the district court dismissed Railey’s petition for lack of standing,
we modify the dismissal order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice. See S. Walk
at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLC,
713 F.3d 175, 185
(4th Cir. 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
2