Filed: Sep. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1772 CLARENCE B. JENKINS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-01775-TLW) Submitted: September 26, 2019 Decided: September 30, 2019 Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1772 CLARENCE B. JENKINS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-01775-TLW) Submitted: September 26, 2019 Decided: September 30, 2019 Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1772
CLARENCE B. JENKINS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-01775-TLW)
Submitted: September 26, 2019 Decided: September 30, 2019
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying the United States’ motion to dismiss
Jenkins’ complaint pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1),
2671-2680 (2012). Jenkins also appeals the court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge, granting the United States’ motion for summary judgment, and
denying Jenkins’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Jenkins v. United States, No. 3:17-cv-01775-TLW (D.S.C. Apr. 9, 2018; filed Jan. 31, 2019
& entered Feb. 1, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2