Filed: Oct. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6965 RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL BUTLER, Defendant - Appellee. No. 19-7016 RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARTA KALINSKI, f/k/a Kalinski; CHRISTINA FOX, f/k/a Fox; CASSANDRA S. LOR, f/k/a Lor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00016-MR; 5:18-cv-00102-
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6965 RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL BUTLER, Defendant - Appellee. No. 19-7016 RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARTA KALINSKI, f/k/a Kalinski; CHRISTINA FOX, f/k/a Fox; CASSANDRA S. LOR, f/k/a Lor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00016-MR; 5:18-cv-00102- M..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6965
RONALD MCCLARY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL BUTLER,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 19-7016
RONALD MCCLARY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARTA KALINSKI, f/k/a Kalinski; CHRISTINA FOX, f/k/a Fox; CASSANDRA
S. LOR, f/k/a Lor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00016-MR; 5:18-cv-00102-
MR)
Submitted: September 26, 2019 Decided: October 1, 2019
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Ronald McClary seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying his motions for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders McClary seeks to appeal are neither
final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3