Filed: Oct. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7216 ROBERT L. MITCHELL, a/k/a Robert Lee Mitchell, a/k/a Robert Mitchell, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILLER; BARBARA MORGAN; JUDGE COSTA PLEICONES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (4:19-cv-01668-CMC) Submitted: October 15, 2019 Decided: October 18, 2019 Before GREGORY, Chief J
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7216 ROBERT L. MITCHELL, a/k/a Robert Lee Mitchell, a/k/a Robert Mitchell, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILLER; BARBARA MORGAN; JUDGE COSTA PLEICONES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (4:19-cv-01668-CMC) Submitted: October 15, 2019 Decided: October 18, 2019 Before GREGORY, Chief Ju..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7216
ROBERT L. MITCHELL, a/k/a Robert Lee Mitchell, a/k/a Robert Mitchell,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILLER; BARBARA MORGAN; JUDGE COSTA
PLEICONES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (4:19-cv-01668-CMC)
Submitted: October 15, 2019 Decided: October 18, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert L. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert L. Mitchell appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Miller, No. 4:19-cv-01668-CMC (D.S.C. Aug 7,
2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2