Filed: Oct. 30, 1985
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 775 F.2d 1157 121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2088 Michael ZEMONICK, et al., Appellants, v. CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, a corporation, et al., Appellees. No. 84-1353. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Oct. 30, 1985. 1 Prior opinion, 4th Cir. 1985, 762 F.2d 381 . ORDER 2 It appears that upon a poll of the court upon the suggestion of a rehearing en banc that Judges Widener, Phillips, Sprouse, Ervin and Chapman, a majority of the judges in regular active service, have voted for it and that Chief
Summary: 775 F.2d 1157 121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2088 Michael ZEMONICK, et al., Appellants, v. CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, a corporation, et al., Appellees. No. 84-1353. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Oct. 30, 1985. 1 Prior opinion, 4th Cir. 1985, 762 F.2d 381 . ORDER 2 It appears that upon a poll of the court upon the suggestion of a rehearing en banc that Judges Widener, Phillips, Sprouse, Ervin and Chapman, a majority of the judges in regular active service, have voted for it and that Chief J..
More
775 F.2d 1157
121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2088
Michael ZEMONICK, et al., Appellants,
v.
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, a corporation, et al., Appellees.
No. 84-1353.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Oct. 30, 1985.
ORDER
2
It appears that upon a poll of the court upon the suggestion of a rehearing en banc that Judges Widener, Phillips, Sprouse, Ervin and Chapman, a majority of the judges in regular active service, have voted for it and that Chief Judge Winter and Judge Wilkinson did not vote because of disqualification.
3
IT IS NOW ORDERED that the case be reheard en banc.
4
The parties will be permitted to file supplemental briefs upon a schedule to be established by the Clerk.
