Filed: Sep. 29, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 802 F.2d 682 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Clarence Paul ROBERTS and Linwood Lee Lloyd, Appellees. No. 85-5122. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Sept. 29, 1986. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh; W. Earl Britt, District Judge. 2 Prior report, 793 F.2d 580 . 3 The appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. In a requested poll of the Court, Judges
Summary: 802 F.2d 682 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Clarence Paul ROBERTS and Linwood Lee Lloyd, Appellees. No. 85-5122. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Sept. 29, 1986. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh; W. Earl Britt, District Judge. 2 Prior report, 793 F.2d 580 . 3 The appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. In a requested poll of the Court, Judges R..
More
802 F.2d 682
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Clarence Paul ROBERTS and Linwood Lee Lloyd, Appellees.
No. 85-5122.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Sept. 29, 1986.
1
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh; W. Earl Britt, District Judge.
3
The appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. In a requested poll of the Court, Judges RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, SPROUSE, CHAPMAN, WILKINSON and WILKINS voted to rehear the case in banc; and Judges WINTER, PHILLIPS, and MURNAGHAN and ERVIN voted against rehearing the case in banc. A majority of judges having voted to grant rehearing in banc,
4
IT IS ORDERED that rehearing in banc is granted.
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be calendared for argument at the December session of Court.
6
Note: For opinions of Circuit Judges Phillips and Murnaghan see 793 F.2d 580.
