Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Whitted v. Jacobs, 862 (1986)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 862 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 19, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 818 F.2d 862 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Earl WHITTED, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Don JACOBS, individually; Don Jacobs, District Attorney; Curtis L. Ellis, individually; Curtis L. Ellis, SBI Agent; State Bureau of Investigation; Superior Court O
More

818 F.2d 862
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Earl WHITTED, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Don JACOBS, individually; Don Jacobs, District Attorney;
Curtis L. Ellis, individually; Curtis L. Ellis, SBI Agent;
State Bureau of Investigation; Superior Court Orders dated
May 19, 1986, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 86-1246.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 27, 1987.
Decided May 12, 1987.

Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Earl Whitted, Jr., appellant pro se.

Raymond Earl Dunn, Sr., Dunn & Dunn; Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General; Ellen Bradshaw Scouten, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing this civil rights action is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Whitted v. Jacobs, C/A No. 86-613-5 (E.D.N.C., Aug. 26, 1986).*

2

AFFIRMED.

*

North Carolina's newly enacted Financial Privacy Act, referred to in Whitted's "Motion to Take Judicial Notice," does not undermine the propriety of the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in this case

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer