Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Glen Roy Kendall, A/K/A Amin Moori v. Peter Manny, Stephen D. Kaften, and C. Hoy Steele, Carlton B. Botte, A.J. Bottley, Jr., 87-6077 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-6077 Visitors: 33
Filed: Dec. 03, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 835 F.2d 874 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Glen Roy KENDALL, a/k/a Amin Moori, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter MANNY, Stephen D. Kaften, Defendants-Appellees, and C. Hoy STEELE, Carlton B. Botte, A.J. Bottley, Jr., Defendants. No. 87-6077. United Stat
More

835 F.2d 874
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Glen Roy KENDALL, a/k/a Amin Moori, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Peter MANNY, Stephen D. Kaften, Defendants-Appellees,
and
C. Hoy STEELE, Carlton B. Botte, A.J. Bottley, Jr., Defendants.

No. 87-6077.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 29, 1987.
Decided Dec. 3, 1987.

(Glen Roy Kendall, appellant pro se.

Richard Alan Saunders, Furniss, Davis & Rashkind, Nancy Tordai O'Shaughnessy, Johnson, Cusack & Bell, Ltd., for Appellee Manny, Sterling Edwards Rives, III, Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson & Hand, for Appellee Kaften.

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Kendall v. Manny, C/A Nos. 85-806-N; 86-286-N (E.D.Va. Apr. 28, 1987).

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer