Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

86-7289 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 86-7289 Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 24, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 841 F.2d 1123 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. In the Case of Jerry W. MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff. Joseph WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Stephen H. SACHS, Attorney General of Maryland; Howard N. Lyles, Warden, Marland Penitentiary; Bernard D. Smith,
More

841 F.2d 1123
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In the Case of Jerry W. MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff.
Joseph WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
Stephen H. SACHS, Attorney General of Maryland; Howard N.
Lyles, Warden, Marland Penitentiary; Bernard D. Smith,
Assistant Warden; Arnold Hopkins, Commissioner; Clarence
J. Guenze, Commissioner; William Anderson; Sgt. Hands;
Peguese; Brown; Shahinian; Lt. Thomas, Defendants-Appellees,
George H. Collins, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary; Robert J.
Lally, Secretary, Maryland Department of Public Safety and
Correctional Services; Defendants Whose Names Are Unknown
At This Time: Correctional Officers and Classification
Officer, Maryland Penitentiary, Defendants, all of whom are
sued individually and in their official capacities, Defendants.

Nos. 86-7289.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 12, 1987.
Decided: Feb. 24, 1988.

Joseph Williams, Jr., appellant pro se.

Mark Disbrow McCurdy, Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of the Attorney General, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Joseph Williams, a Maryland inmate, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint. As Williams failed to file objections to the magistrate's findings and recommendation upon proper notice, we find that he has waived appellate review of the decision below. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir.1985).

2

We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer