Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Frankie McCoy v. Howard N. Lyles, Warden Cpl. Russell, Ii, Correctional Officer, Defendants, 87-7406 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-7406 Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 24, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 841 F.2d 1123 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Frankie McCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Howard N. LYLES, Warden; Cpl. Russell, II, Correctional Officer, Defendants- Appellees. No. 87-7406. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 2
More

841 F.2d 1123
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frankie McCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Howard N. LYLES, Warden; Cpl. Russell, II, Correctional
Officer, Defendants- Appellees.

No. 87-7406.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 25, 1988.
Decided: Feb. 24, 1988.

Frankie McCoy, appellant pro se.

Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, for appellees.

Before CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Frankie McCoy, a Maryland inmate, appeals from the district court's entry of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We affirm the district court's judgment because McCoy was afforded due process in connection with the adjustment hearing. See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974). There existed "some evidence" to support his conviction, Superintendent, Mass. Corr. Inst. v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445 (1985), and we decline to review the hearing officer's factual findings, Kelly v. Cooper, 502 F. Supp. 1371 (E.D.Va.1980). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively. McCoy's motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer