Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

87-7196 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-7196 Visitors: 37
Filed: Mar. 01, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 842 F.2d 1289 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Wyatt CHAMP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William Donald SCHAEFER, Mayor of Baltimore City; H. Mebane Turner; President Jail Board of Baltimore City; Harry R. Vaughn, Formerly Acting Warden Baltimore City Jail;
More

842 F.2d 1289
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wyatt CHAMP, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William Donald SCHAEFER, Mayor of Baltimore City; H. Mebane
Turner; President Jail Board of Baltimore City; Harry R.
Vaughn, Formerly Acting Warden Baltimore City Jail; Deputy
Warden Cochrane, Baltimore City Jail; Major Wyatt; Major
Bryant; Captain Young; Sergeant Myles; Officer Crew, All
employees or former employees at the Baltimore City Jail;
Chief of Social Work, Baltimore City Jail (Unidentified-John
Doe # 1); Director of Inmate Legal Services, Baltimore City
Jail (Unidentified-John Doe # 2); Marty Katzenstein, Chief
Psychologist, Baltimore City Jail; Michael Lehane, Hearing
Commissioner, Baltimore City Jail; Lieutenant Weems,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-7196.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 26, 1987.
Decided March 1, 1988.

Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

Wyatt Champ, appellant pro se.

Benjamin L. Brown, City Solicitor, J. Shawn Alcarese, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Champ v. Schaefer, C/A No. 84-3791-HM (D.Md. May 20, 1987).

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer