Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

87-7397 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-7397 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 17, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 856 F.2d 187 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Richard Paul MICHAEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. Randall COATES, States Attorney for Worcester County, Joel J. Todd, Assistant States Attorney for Worcester County, Warne C. Littleton, Clerk of the Circuit
More

856 F.2d 187
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard Paul MICHAEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
B. Randall COATES, States Attorney for Worcester County,
Joel J. Todd, Assistant States Attorney for Worcester
County, Warne C. Littleton, Clerk of the Circuit County for
Worcester County, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-7397.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 1988.

Richard Paul Michael, appellant pro se.

Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Julia Melville Freit, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before ERVIN, CHAPMAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Richard Paul Michael appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Michael v. Coates, C/A No. 87-702-HAR (D.Md. Oct. 27, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer