Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Roger G. Payton, Jr. v. James Johnson, Warden Attorney General of the State of Virginia, Respondents, 88-7603 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7603 Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 02, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 857 F.2d 1469 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Roger G. PAYTON, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. James JOHNSON, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Virginia, Respondents- Appellees. No. 88-7603. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitt
More

857 F.2d 1469
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roger G. PAYTON, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
James JOHNSON, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Virginia, Respondents- Appellees.

No. 88-7603.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 30, 1988.
Decided: Sept. 2, 1988.

Roger G. Payton, Jr., appellant pro se.

Robert Quentin Harris (Office of the Attorney General of Virginia), for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Roger G. Payton, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Payton v. Johnson, CA-87-507-AM (E.D.Va. Mar. 7, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer