Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Carlton J. Smith, 87-5683 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-5683 Visitors: 29
Filed: Oct. 19, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 859 F.2d 1200 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlton J. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 87-5683. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Oct. 19, 1988. 1 On Petition for Rehearing with Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc. 2 Prior Report: 851 F.2d 706 (4th Cir.). ORDER 3 The appellee's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. In a requested poll of the Court, Judges Russell, Widener, Chapman, Wilkinson and Wilkins voted to re
More

859 F.2d 1200

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carlton J. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-5683.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1988.

1

On Petition for Rehearing with Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc.

2

Prior Report: 851 F.2d 706 (4th Cir.).

ORDER

3

The appellee's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. In a requested poll of the Court, Judges Russell, Widener, Chapman, Wilkinson and Wilkins voted to rehear the case in banc; and Judges Winter, Hall, Phillips, Murnaghan, Sprouse and Ervin voted against rehearing the case in banc. As a majority of the judges voted to deny rehearing in banc, and

4

As the panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of the opinion that it should be denied,

5

IT IS ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc are denied.

6

Entered at the direction of Judge Winter, with the concurrence of Judge Spencer, United States District Judge, sitting by designation. Judge Chapman dissents.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer