Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

88-7138 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7138 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 14, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 861 F.2d 263 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Antonio ALMANZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Toni V. BAIR, Regional Administrator; Fred W. Green, Acting Warden; W.E. Thorne, Chief of Security; Louis B. Cei, Central Classification Bd. Manager; Edward Morris,
More

861 F.2d 263
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Antonio ALMANZA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Toni V. BAIR, Regional Administrator; Fred W. Green, Acting
Warden; W.E. Thorne, Chief of Security; Louis B. Cei,
Central Classification Bd. Manager; Edward Morris, Deputy
Director; Dan Larsen, Central Classification Bd. Member;
R.A. Lipsner, Central Classification Bd. Member, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-7138.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 16, 1988.
Decided: Oct. 14, 1988.

Antonio Almanza, appellant pro se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr. (Office of the Attorney General of Virginia), for appellees.

Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Antonio Almanza appeals from the magistrate's orders granting summary judgment against him in his action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 and denying his motion to vacate the judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate. Almanza v. Bair, CA-87-730-R (E.D.Va. May 19, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer