Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jorge Alberto Ruiz, 88-7159 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7159 Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 06, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 861 F.2d 266 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge Alberto RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-7159. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Aug. 30, 1988. Decided: Oct. 6, 1988. Jorge
More

861 F.2d 266
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jorge Alberto RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 88-7159.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 30, 1988.
Decided: Oct. 6, 1988.

Jorge Alberto Ruiz, appellant pro se.

Debra Jo Stuart (Office of the United States Attorney), for appellee.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Jorge Alberto Ruiz appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ruiz, CR-83-51, CA-88-111-P (W.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer