Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lee Odis Alford v. William R. Barker, Attorney General of North Carolina, 88-7190 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7190 Visitors: 28
Filed: Oct. 27, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 862 F.2d 313 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lee Odis ALFORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William R. BARKER, Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 88-7190. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 27, 1988.
More

862 F.2d 313

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lee Odis ALFORD, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William R. BARKER, Attorney General of North Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 88-7190.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 27, 1988.
Decided Oct. 27, 1988.

Lee Odis Alford, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Lee Odis Alford seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Alford v. Barker, C/A No. 87-920-HC (E.D.N.C. June 20, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer