Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lillie M. Lyons v. J.A. Marchman, Tom Crenshaw, Barry Factory Stores of Norfolk Insurance, D/B/A Barry's Manufacturing Company, Harold S. Zeeman, Jr., 88-2169 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-2169 Visitors: 33
Filed: Mar. 23, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 872 F.2d 418 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lillie M. LYONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.A. MARCHMAN, Tom Crenshaw, Barry Factory Stores of Norfolk Insurance, d/b/a Barry's Manufacturing Company, Harold S. Zeeman, Jr., Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-2169
More

872 F.2d 418
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lillie M. LYONS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
J.A. MARCHMAN, Tom Crenshaw, Barry Factory Stores of Norfolk
Insurance, d/b/a Barry's Manufacturing Company,
Harold S. Zeeman, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-2169.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 30, 1988.
Decided March 23, 1989.

Lillie M. Lyons, appellant pro se.

Leto Copeley, Smith, Patterson, Foillin, Curtis, James & Harkavy, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Lillie M. Lyons appeals from the district court's order dismissing her complaint asserting claims of employment discrimination, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e et seq., and breach of contract. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lyons v. Marchman, C/A No. 86-713 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer