Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

88-6655 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-6655 Visitors: 33
Filed: Mar. 24, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 872 F.2d 418 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Joseph P. PAYNE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Toni BAIR, Warden, Fred Greene, Acting Warden/Asst. Warden, Joseph Killen, Operations Officer, R.L. Harvell, Treatment Supervisor, Dorothy Campbell, Mailroom Cl
More

872 F.2d 418
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joseph P. PAYNE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Toni BAIR, Warden, Fred Greene, Acting Warden/Asst. Warden,
Joseph Killen, Operations Officer, R.L. Harvell, Treatment
Supervisor, Dorothy Campbell, Mailroom Clerk, R.A. Young,
Regional Administrator, E.C. Morris, Deputy Director, C.P.
Williams, Sergeant, John Does, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-6655.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 9, 1988.
Decided March 24, 1989.

Joseph P. Payne, Sr., appellant pro se.

Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, SPROUSE, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Joseph P. Payne, Sr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Payne v. Bair, C/A No. 87-41-AM (E.D.Va. May 3, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer