Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Elford Guy Coker v. Robert W. Donlin, Acting Warden, Attorney General of South Carolina, 89-7537 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7537 Visitors: 115
Filed: May 12, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 875 F.2d 314 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Elford Guy COKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert W. DONLIN, Acting Warden, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 89-7537. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted
More

875 F.2d 314
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Elford Guy COKER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Robert W. DONLIN, Acting Warden, Attorney General of South
Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-7537.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 30, 1989.
Decided May 12, 1989.

Elford Guy Coker, appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Elford Guy Coker seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Coker v. Donlin, C/A No. 88-1769 (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer