Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

William L. Lowery v. State of North Carolina, Attorney General of North Carolina, 89-7520 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7520 Visitors: 37
Filed: Jul. 10, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 877 F.2d 60 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. William L. LOWERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of NORTH CAROLINA, Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 89-7520. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted May 19,
More

877 F.2d 60
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William L. LOWERY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA, Attorney General of North Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-7520.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 19, 1989.
Decided June 7, 1989.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied July 10, 1989.

William L. Lowery, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

William L. Lowery seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lowery v. State of North Carolina, C/A No. 88-408-HC (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer