Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Michael Sewell Smith v. William Mann, Deputy, Lieutenant Smith, Virginia Beach Sheriff's Department, 89-7524 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7524 Visitors: 41
Filed: Jun. 14, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 877 F.2d 60 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Michael Sewell SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William MANN, Deputy, Lieutenant Smith, Virginia Beach Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-7524. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. J
More

877 F.2d 60
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael Sewell SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William MANN, Deputy, Lieutenant Smith, Virginia Beach
Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-7524.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

June 14, 1989.

Michael Sewell Smith, appellant pro se.

Richard McAllister Swope, Laura Adrienne Misner, Williams, Worrell, Kelly, Greer & Frank, PC, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Michael Sewell Smith appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Mann, C/A No. 86-425-N (E.D.Va. Dec. 23, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer