Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

88-7808 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7808 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 27, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 878 F.2d 378 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Timothy Carness AUTRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant RICHARDSON, Aaron Johnson, B.A. Hoffner, Gary T. Dixon, Lieutenant Lamm, Sergeant Wilson, C.D. Hayslett, D.L. Alford, Officer Hart, Officer Young, Off
More

878 F.2d 378
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Timothy Carness AUTRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sergeant RICHARDSON, Aaron Johnson, B.A. Hoffner, Gary T.
Dixon, Lieutenant Lamm, Sergeant Wilson, C.D. Hayslett, D.L.
Alford, Officer Hart, Officer Young, Officer McLaughlin,
D.R. Hayes, G. Williams, Central Prison Law Library,
Defendants-Appellees

No. 88-7808.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1989.
Decided June 27, 1989.

Timothy Carness Autry, appellant pro se.

Howard Edwin Hill, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Timothy Carness Autry appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Autry v. Richardson, C/A No. 88-232-CRT (E.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer