Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In Re Mack Daniel Chisolm, 88-8044 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-8044 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 23, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 878 F.2d 379 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. In re Mack Daniel CHISOLM, Petitioner. No. 88-8044. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 30, 1989. Decided June 23, 1989. Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Mack
More

878 F.2d 379
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re Mack Daniel CHISOLM, Petitioner.

No. 88-8044.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 1989.
Decided June 23, 1989.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Mack Daniel Chisolm, pro se.

PER CURIAM:

1

Complaining of delay, Mack Daniel Chisholm has applied to this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to act on his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion for correction of his sentence. The district court has since denied Chisholm's Rule 35(a) motion. United States v. Chisholm, Cr. No. 87-312 (D.S.C. Nov. 30, 1988). Accordingly, although leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

PETITION DENIED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer