Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

89-7002 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7002 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 26, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 878 F.2d 379 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. elton L. DORTY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Jim MARTIN, Governor, Highway Patrol Commissioner, Chairman of Highway Patrol State Troopers, Three Unknown Highway Patrol State Troopers, Defendants-Appellees. N
More

878 F.2d 379
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
elton L. DORTY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
Jim MARTIN, Governor, Highway Patrol Commissioner, Chairman
of Highway Patrol State Troopers, Three Unknown
Highway Patrol State Troopers,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-7002.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 31, 1989.
Decided June 26, 1989.

Delton L. Dorty, Sr., appellant pro se.

Isaac T. Avery, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL, CHAPMAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Delton L. Dorty Sr. appeals from the district court's order affirming the magistrate's order granting defendants an extension of time to answer. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

2

Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 this Court has jurisdiction over appeals from final orders. A final order is one which disposes of all issues in dispute as to all parties. It "ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment." Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945).

3

As the order appealed from is not a final order, it is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. The district court has not directed entry of final judgment as to particular claims or parties under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), nor is the order appealable under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292. Finally, the order is not appealable as a collateral order under Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

4

Finding no basis for appellate jurisdiction, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues have been decided authoritatively.

5

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer