Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Thomas T. McLean v. Charles M. Creecy, Jr., Randy Lee, Raymond Moore, H. Williams, Luther Whitaker, Ray Braddy, Claude Wiggins, James Salmon, 89-6514 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-6514 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 20, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 878 F.2d 379 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Thomas T. MCLEAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles M. CREECY, Jr., Randy Lee, Raymond Moore, H. Williams, Luther Whitaker, Ray Braddy, Claude Wiggins, James Salmon, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-6514. United
More

878 F.2d 379
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Thomas T. MCLEAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles M. CREECY, Jr., Randy Lee, Raymond Moore, H.
Williams, Luther Whitaker, Ray Braddy, Claude
Wiggins, James Salmon, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6514.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 21, 1989.
Decided June 20, 1989.

Thomas T. McLean, appellant pro se.

Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Thomas T. McLean appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McLean v. Creecy, C/A No. 88-356-CRT (E.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer