Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gary Lee Roller v. Kenneth D. McKellar Warden Scdc, Cci T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of South Carolina, 89-7144 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7144 Visitors: 21
Filed: Nov. 24, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 891 F.2d 287 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Gary Lee ROLLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kenneth D. McKELLAR, Warden SCDC, CCI; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 89-7144. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted:
More

891 F.2d 287

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gary Lee ROLLER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Kenneth D. McKELLAR, Warden SCDC, CCI; T. Travis Medlock,
Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-7144.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 31, 1989.
Decided: Nov. 24, 1989.

Gary Lee Roller, appellant pro se.

Salley Wood Elliott (Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina), for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Gary Lee Roller seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Roller v. McKellar, et al, CA-88-288-3-15J (D.S.C. April 19, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer