Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

89-7582 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7582 Visitors: 20
Filed: May 04, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 896 F.2d 546 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Elroy LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA; A.E. Robinson, Chief Judge; US Attorney General; Edward Northrop, Judge; Thomas Hogan, Judge; US Attorney's Office; Judge Shuka; DC Parole Board an
More

896 F.2d 546
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Elroy LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA; A.E. Robinson, Chief Judge; US
Attorney General; Edward Northrop, Judge; Thomas Hogan,
Judge; US Attorney's Office; Judge Shuka; DC Parole Board
and Members; Marion Barry, Mayor; Administrator, Maximum
Security Facility; Director, Department of Corrections;
William Hamann, Detective; Detective Mitchell; Detective
Jenkin, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-7582.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 30, 1989.
Decided Feb. 6, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 4, 1990.

Elroy Lewis, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and HARRISON L. WINTER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Elroy Lewis appeals from the district court's order dismissing Lewis' 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1964(c) action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Governor of Virginia, CA-89-154-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 3, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer