Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dorothy J. Travis v. Department of the Army John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army, 88-2867 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-2867 Visitors: 32
Filed: Feb. 05, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 896 F.2d 547 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1056 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dorothy J. TRAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY; John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-2867. United States Court of Ap
More

896 F.2d 547

59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1056

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dorothy J. TRAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY; John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of
the Army, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-2867.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 30, 1989.
Decided: Feb. 5, 1990.

Dorothy J. Travis, appellant pro se.

Billy S. Bradley, Assistant United States Attorney; Stewart Carl Hudson, United States Army, for appellee.

Before K.K. HALL, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Dorothy Jeanne Travis appeals the district court's dismissal of her Title VII action, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-16(c), on grounds of res judicata. Our review of the record, the district court's opinion, and the briefs on appeal discloses that this appeal is without merit. We accordingly affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Travis v. Department of the Army, C/A No. 88-766-S (D.Md. June 6, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues have recently been decided authoritatively. See Shoup v. Bell & Howell Co., 872 F.2d 1178 (4th Cir.1989); see also Johnson v. Burnley, --- F.2d ----, No. 88-3645 (4th Cir.Oct. 6, 1989).

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer