Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

89-1543_1 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-1543_1 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 07, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 896 F.2d 547 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. In re TARA OF NORTH HILLS, a North Carolina General Partnership, Debtor. PIONEER SAVINGS BANK, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, and David W. Boone, trustee in bankruptcy for Tara of North Hills, Plaintiff,
More

896 F.2d 547
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re TARA OF NORTH HILLS, a North Carolina General
Partnership, Debtor.
PIONEER SAVINGS BANK, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
David W. Boone, trustee in bankruptcy for Tara of North
Hills, Plaintiff,
v.
Barney K. HUANG; Lindy W. Huang, Defendants-Appellants,
and
Garland Avent; Ann R. Avent, Defendants.

No. 89-1543.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 27, 1989.
Decided: Feb. 7, 1990.

Trawick H. Stubbs, Jr., Jeffrey A. DeMatthew, Stubbs, Perdue, Chesnutt, Wheeler & Clemmons, P.A., for appellants.

John M. Shaw, David M. Warren, Laura Broughton Russell, Poyner & Spruill, P.A., for appellees.

Before SPROUSE and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

The appeal in this bankruptcy case concerns allegations by Barney and Lindy Huang that Pioneer Savings Bank breached its duty to act in good faith and deal with them fairly in respect to a mortgage debt. The Huangs urge that the district court erred in affirming the bankruptcy court's entry of summary judgment for Pioneer.

2

Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boone v. Huang (In re Tara of North Hills ), 89-509-Civ-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer