Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Leon Knight v. R.M. Muncy, Warden, 89-6643 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-6643 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 30, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 898 F.2d 146 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Leon KNIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R.M. MUNCY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-6643. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Nov. 17, 1989. Decided: Feb. 20, 1990. Rehearing and Re
More

898 F.2d 146
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Leon KNIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
R.M. MUNCY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 89-6643.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 17, 1989.
Decided: Feb. 20, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied March 30, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 89-189-N)

Leon Knight, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Leon Knight seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Knight v. Muncy, CA-89-189-N (E.D.Va. May 5, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer