Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

89-7734 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7734 Visitors: 35
Filed: Feb. 27, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 898 F.2d 147 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. William G. TRAIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey REED, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, Circuit Court of Wood County, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26101; David Owins, Parkersburg Newspaper Office, Wood County, Wes
More

898 F.2d 147
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William G. TRAIL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jeffrey REED, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, Circuit Court of
Wood County, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26101;
David Owins, Parkersburg Newspaper
Office, Wood County, West
Virginia,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-7734.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 15, 1989.
Decided: Feb. 27, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden, II, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 89-891-A)

William G. Trail, appellant pro se.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

William G. Trail appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Trail v. Reed, C/A No. 89-891-A (S.D.W.Va. July 24, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer