Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robert Wayne Robinson v. Thomas R. Israel, 89-6839 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-6839 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 07, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 905 F.2d 1531 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Wayne ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Thomas R. ISRAEL, Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-6839. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 24, 1990. Decided May 7, 1990. Appeal from
More

905 F.2d 1531
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Wayne ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Thomas R. ISRAEL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 89-6839.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 24, 1990.
Decided May 7, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (C/A No. 88-71-AM)

Robert Wayne Robinson, appellant pro se.

Frank Snead Ferguson, Office of the Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and HARRISON L. WINTER*, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Robert Wayne Robinson seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Israel, C/A No. 88-71-AM (E.D.Va. Sept. 11, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

*

Judge Winter participated in the consideration of this case but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 46(d)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer