Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Sherrie Lynn Webb, 90-6768 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6768 Visitors: 32
Filed: May 18, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 905 F.2d 1533 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sherrie Lynn WEBB, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-6768. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted May 7, 1990. Decided May 18, 1990. Appeal fro
More

905 F.2d 1533
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sherrie Lynn WEBB, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-6768.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 7, 1990.
Decided May 18, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR No. 82-270-S-M; C/A No. 90-38-S)

Sherrie Lynn Webb, appellant pro se.

Breckinridge Long Willcox, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Sherrie Lynn Webb appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Webb, CR No. 82-270-S-M; C/A No. 90-38-S (D.Md. Jan. 19, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer