Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Calvin P. Bloxom v. Fred Greene James Johnson Phyllis Cornelius, 90-7322 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-7322 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 19, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 907 F.2d 1137 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Calvin P. BLOXOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fred GREENE; James Johnson; Phyllis Cornelius, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-7322. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 4, 1990. Decided J
More

907 F.2d 1137
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Calvin P. BLOXOM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Fred GREENE; James Johnson; Phyllis Cornelius, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-7322.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 4, 1990.
Decided June 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (C/A No. 90-134-R)

Calvin P. Bloxom, appellant pro se.

Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Calvin P. Bloxom appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Bloxom v. Greene, C/A No. 90-134-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 26, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

We also deny Bloxom's motion for a preliminary injunction

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer