Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. James I. Welch, A/K/A Cherokee, 90-6797 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6797 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jul. 16, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 908 F.2d 968 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James I. WELCH, a/k/a Cherokee, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-6797. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted May 7, 1990. Decided July 16, 199
More

908 F.2d 968
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James I. WELCH, a/k/a Cherokee, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-6797.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 7, 1990.
Decided July 16, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District Judge. (CR No. 87-42-NN; C/A No. 90-10-NN)

James I. Welch, appellant pro se.

Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

James I. Welch appeals from the district court's orders refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Welch, CR No. 87-42-NN; C/A No. 90-10-NN (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer