Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anthony Anderson v. Dave Williams, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 89-7801 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7801 Visitors: 73
Filed: Dec. 11, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 911 F.2d 720 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Anthony ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dave WILLIAMS, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Respondents-Appellees. No. 89-7801. United States Court of A
More

911 F.2d 720
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dave WILLIAMS, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center,
Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-7801.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 25, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Dec. 11, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, United States Magistrate. (C/A No. 89-205-R)

Anthony Anderson, appellant pro se.

Eugene Paul Murphy, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Anthony Anderson seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Anderson v. Williams, C/A No. 89-205-R (E.D.Va. Sept. 7, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer