Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anthony Ray Solomon v. Captain McCabe Lieutenant Byrd, Lieutenant Hodge, Lieutenant Askew, Lieutenant Carroll, Officer Sutton, 90-6073 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6073 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 23, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 911 F.2d 724 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Anthony Ray SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Captain McCABE, Lieutenant Byrd, Lieutenant Hodge, Lieutenant Askew, Lieutenant Carroll, Officer Sutton, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-6073. United States Court o
More

911 F.2d 724
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony Ray SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Captain McCABE, Lieutenant Byrd, Lieutenant Hodge,
Lieutenant Askew, Lieutenant Carroll, Officer
Sutton, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6073.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 23, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 88-877-CRT)

Anthony Ray Solomon, appellant pro se.

Valerie Bateman, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Anthony Ray Solomon appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Solomon v. McCabe, C/A No. 88-877-CRT (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 1990).

2

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer