Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Charles Frances West, Jr., 90-7316 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-7316 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 24, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 911 F.2d 726 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Frances WEST, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-7316. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1990. Decided July 24, 1990. A
More

911 F.2d 726
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles Frances WEST, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-7316.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 24, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CR No. 87-43-K; C/A No. 89-201-K)

Charles Frances West, Jr., appellant pro se.

William Anthony Kolibash, United States Attorney, Elkins, W.Va., for appellee.

N.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Charles Frances West, Jr. appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. West, CR No. 87-43-K; C/A No. 89-201-K (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 6, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer