Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Aaron A. Austin v. United States of America, Cabot Corporation, Appalachian Exploration & Development, Incorporated, Piney Coking Coal, 90-1041 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-1041 Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 30, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 912 F.2d 463 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Aaron A. AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Cabot Corporation, Appalachian Exploration & Development, Incorporated, Piney Coking Coal, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-1041. United States
More

912 F.2d 463
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Aaron A. AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Cabot Corporation, Appalachian
Exploration & Development, Incorporated, Piney
Coking Coal, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-1041.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 25, 1990.
Decided Aug. 30, 1990.

Aaron A. Austin, appellant pro se.

Before MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Aaron A. Austin appeals from the district court's order dismissing his suit, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny Austin's motions requesting a restraining order and a change in the caption of this lawsuit, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Austin v. United States, CA-90-589-5 (S.D.W.Va. June 14, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer