Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wilbur M. Watts v. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 90-6080 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6080 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 12, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 915 F.2d 1566 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Wilbur M. WATTS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent-Appellee. No. 90-6080. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 27, 1990. Decide
More

915 F.2d 1566
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wilbur M. WATTS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 90-6080.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 27, 1990.
Decided Sept. 28, 1990.
As Amended Oct. 12, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, United States Magistrate. (CA-87-757-R)

Wilbur M. Watts, appellant pro se.

Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Wilbur M. Watts seeks to appeal the magistrate's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate. Watts v. Attorney General, CA-87-757-R (E.D.Va. May 10, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer