Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wayne L. Powell v. Department of Natural Resources Maryland Environmental Services, 89-3369 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-3369 Visitors: 42
Filed: Oct. 31, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 917 F.2d 558 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. WAYNE L. POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES; MARYLAND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-3369 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH CIRCUIT Submitted: October
More

917 F.2d 558
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
WAYNE L. POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES; MARYLAND ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-3369

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS,
FOURTH CIRCUIT

Submitted: October 1, 1990
Decided: October 31, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, United States Magistrate. (CA-89-801-JH)

Wayne L. Powell, Appellant Pro Se.

Maureen O'Ferrall Gardner, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Wayne L. Powell appeals from the district court's order denying relief in this action charging racial discrimination in employment, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e et seq. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Powell v. Department of Natural Resources, CA-89-801-JH (D. Md. Oct. 20, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer