Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Larry Yancey v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, 90-1506 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-1506 Visitors: 23
Filed: Nov. 13, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 917 F.2d 1303 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Larry YANCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-1506. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 29, 1990. De
More

917 F.2d 1303
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Larry YANCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-1506.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Nov. 13, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-90-379)

Larry Yancey, appellant pro se.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Larry Yancey appeals from the district court's order dismissing Yancey's claim as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Yancey v. Sullivan, CA-90-379 (M.D.N.C. July 25, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer